Return-Path: <ratwell_at_mac_dot_com> Mailing-List: contact type2-help_at_type2_dot_com; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list type2_at_type2_dot_com Delivered-To: type2_at_type2_dot_com Received: (qmail 55422 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2004 18:50:05 -0000 Received: (QMFILT: 1.1); 23 Feb 2004 18:50:05 -0000 Received: from a17-250-248-89.apple_dot_com (HELO smtpout.mac_dot_com) (17.250.248.89) by 209.246.234.42 with SMTP; 23 Feb 2004 18:50:05 -0000 Received: from mac_dot_com (smtpin08-en2 [10.13.10.153]) by smtpout.mac_dot_com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id i1NIo4Mq021851 for <type2_at_type2_dot_com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:50:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from [67.170.225.134] (c-67-170-225-134.client_dot_comcast_dot_net [67.170.225.134]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac_dot_com (Xserve/smtpin08/MantshX 3.0) with ESMTP id i1NIo41n028728 for <type2_at_type2_dot_com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:50:04 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.0.2006 Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:50:02 -0800 From: Richard Atwell <ratwell_at_mac_dot_com> To: Type2 <type2_at_type2_dot_com> Message-ID: <BC5F8B5A.9B49%ratwell_at_mac_dot_com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Injector cleaning WRT the recent topic, I had my fuel injectors cleaned and tested. I really didn't know what to expect since they spent 11 years sitting idle and I had that problem with the sludge in the gas tank but I felt the bus drove well and had a fair amount of pickup for a 2L engine despite the varnish I saw in the fuel lines. I thought I'd share the report. Basically, Bosch originally provided a well matched set, the o-ring inside one injector failed and it seems no amount of FI cleaner could restore the spray pattern compared to having them professionally cleaned. I haven't driven the bus with them back in yet but if you can't find NOS injectors at bargain prices cleaning seems like a good deal for $11 each. Preliminary Test Results ------------------------ Test pressure = 43.5 psi Test 1. Injector Resistance 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.5 Test 2. Leak Down Test (Pass / Fail) P P P F <- o-ring failure Test 3. Spray Pattern (Good / Fair / Poor) F F F F Test 4. 90 Second Pulsed Flow Delivery (mL) 76 75 77 75 Test 5. 100mL Pulsed Volume 99 98 100 97 Test 6. 20 Second Static Flow (mL) 74 74 76 74 Test 7. 100mL Static Flow 97 97 100 97 Test 8a. Injector Coil Test - On 5.9 5.89 6.01 5.95 Test 8b. Injector Coil Test - Off 6.2 6.19 6.32 6.24 Test Results After Service -------------------------- Test pressure = 43.5 psi Test 1. Leak Down Test (Pass / Fail) P P P P Test 2. Spray Pattern (Good / Fair / Poor) G G G G Test 3. 90 Second Pulsed Flow Delivery (mL) 79 77.5 78 78 Test 4. 100mL Pulsed Volume 100 98 99 99 Test 5. 20 Second Static Flow (mL) 75.5 75.5 76 75.5 Test 6. 100mL Static Flow 99 99 100 99 Approximate pound-per-hour flow 19.37 19.37 19.5 19.37 -- Richard, 1978 Westfalia CDN http://homepage.mac_dot_com/ratwell Cupertino, CA